On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 13:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 16:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > >From my perspective, the two main avenues to a new Fedora release are > > the live installer and preupgrade, and those two should get all the > > attention they can get. > > I'd say the main problem with preupgrade testing is that, given the > fairly limited resources QA has, it's rather hard for us to recreate the > infinite configurations people in the real world will try to run > preupgrade on. It's inherently a nightmare of complexity. We can > certainly try and do _better_ testing than we currently do, though. Sure you can't hope to test a full matrix, but that is just as much the case for anaconda... yet the anaconda test matrix looks a lot more complete than the upgrade one. Anyway, I don't want to make it sound like the upgrade situation is mainly a QA problem - it is first-and-foremost a maintainership problem; we must get out of the situation that one of the two main avenues to the next release is wwoods weekend project - of course, the other one being the unloved stepchild of the installer team is not exactly perfect either... -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
