On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 11:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > 1) in the end, we focused heavily on just three component areas for > testing: anaconda, kernel, and X.org. This is primarily a function of > the fact that these are the most vital bits; it feels like we're still > at the point of doing 'let's make sure it's not totally broken' testing > than 'let's make sure it's really good' testing. I agree with this assessment. I would go even further and say it is to a large extent 'lets make sure the installer is not totally broken for exotic cases' testing. >From my perspective, the two main avenues to a new Fedora release are the live installer and preupgrade, and those two should get all the attention they can get. > We didn't do stuff like making sure the desktop was polished. I don't think lack of QA was a major impediment to our polishing efforts. Of course, QA involvement is still appreciated... -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
