On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> Over the next week, I plan to organize any feedback and discuss the > >> highlights during an upcoming QA team meeting. The goal will be to > >> prioritize the pain points and use as a basis for defining objectives > >> for Fedora 13. > >> > >> Thanks for your feedback! > >> James > > > > 1) in the end, we focused heavily on just three component areas for > > testing: anaconda, kernel, and X.org. This is primarily a function of > > the fact that these are the most vital bits; it feels like we're still > > at the point of doing 'let's make sure it's not totally broken' > > testing > > than 'let's make sure it's really good' testing. We didn't do stuff > > like > > making sure the desktop was polished. > > Define the "we" here as the desktop team did put a lot of time into > polish of the desktop. Given that this is a QA retrospective for the QA team being discussed on the QA mailing list, I thought it fairly obvious that the 'we' was QA :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
