On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:27 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > I don't think abrt bugs should be filed as if they had been triaged, > > because there are cases where an abrt-filed bug will still need manual > > I was not asking about abrt, but about upstream release monitoring[0] > (Formerly known as FEVer), which will file new bugs when a new upstream > release is available. Currently new bugs are created agains Rawhide as ASSIGNED, > FutureFeature. So I guess the workflow change should make this NEW, > FutureFeature, Triaged? ahh, I misunderstood. Apologies. Indeed, yes, that would be appropriate. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list