Re: Bug Triage workflow for F13 and beyond

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:27 +0100, Till Maas wrote:

> > I don't think abrt bugs should be filed as if they had been triaged,
> > because there are cases where an abrt-filed bug will still need manual
> 
> I was not asking about abrt, but about upstream release monitoring[0]
> (Formerly known as FEVer), which will file new bugs when a new upstream
> release is available. Currently new bugs are created agains Rawhide as ASSIGNED,
> FutureFeature. So I guess the workflow change should make this NEW,
> FutureFeature, Triaged?

ahh, I misunderstood. Apologies. Indeed, yes, that would be appropriate.

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux