Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 00:31 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
It's not a "perhaps do something stupid": As far as I can tell
reliably dies every time during the update and the session saving
function fails to do its job. Everything the user was working on in
Firefox is lost.
This is not what happens to me. What happens to me is that Firefox
continues to run but the search box doesn't work any more.
Perhaps people should recognize that everyone experiences slightly
different behaviour in this particular scenario, and that everyone uses
their systems differently, and stop extrapolating from their own
experience and assume that it's perfectly fine to kill off every running
firefox instance on a system when the package is updated. Because that's
not something you just do on the 'hmm, well, it feels like it'd work for
me' basis.
What are you trying to say. A set of users are saying that current
procedures cause data loss for them and are suggesting a procedure that
would avoid the problem. You don't experience data loss. That doesn't
help them. You are arguing that you don't need their solution and that
their solution would inconvenience you.
Even though this has not affected me as yet, I think that it is better
to inconvenience me than to cause data loss to others. In my world, even
denial of service is only a severe error, data loss is a critical error.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
