On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
... snip ...
> > Transaction Check Error:
> > file /lib/udev/hid2hci from install of udev-145-12.fc12.x86_64
> > conflicts with file from package bluez-4.42-9.fc11.x86_64
> > file /lib/udev/rules.d/70-hid2hci.rules from install of
> > udev-145-12.fc12.x86_64
> > conflicts with file from package bluez-4.42-9.fc11.x86_64
... snip ...
> > as i read the above (and correct me if i'm doing this incorrectly),
> > i certainly see a newer (rawhide) version of bluez that i would have
> > thought would be part of the upgrade, but apparently it isn't.
> >
> > if i go back through the lengthy list of packages to be
> > installed/upgraded, nothing of the form "bluez*" is listed. why not?
> > it's listed as available, it's clearly(?) in rawhide, but it's somehow
> > not being picked up in this sizable upgrade.
> >
> > how *would* one interpret the above diagnostic?
>
> I would interpret it as impossible to decipher w/o the complete output. Please
> file a bug about it and include the entire output - don't snip anything out.
>
> thanks,
> -sv
easy enough to do, i just wanted some verification that it wasn't
something silly i was doing. BZ against yum/rawhide? or what?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
