On 10/27/2009 04:26 PM, James Laska wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:26 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [snip] >> >>> So, I'm just curious, do you have some advice how to draw attention >>> to a particular bug the right people, except from reporting it into >>> bugzilla and waiting perhaps months or years? I mean it for this issue >>> but I also mean it generally for other (future) issues. Give me a hint >>> if you have some. Thanks! >>> >> File the bug with upstream rather than just lobbing it into bugzilla. >> >> Two minutes after I received your list mail (35 minutes after you sent >> it) you had a response (though, it's one telling you that your problem >> is NOTABUG in libtheora)— behold the power of an issue reaching >> someone with upstream experience. >> > Thanks for your feedback in the bug report Gregory. I read Kamil's > message to the list more around how to couple test feedback with feature > pages. We have one obvious method now in Test Days. Unfortunately, we > have far more features than test days. So, once a feature is complete > and available in rawhide ... as testers, what's our mechanism to provide > the feature owner(s) with test feedback as they've requested [1]? > > Thanks, > James > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Thusnelda#How_To_Test > I perceived Kamil's message just as Gregory. If it had been me I would have filed those bugs against istanbul or recordmydesktop regardless of that the "How to test" section of Thusnelda feature page does not contain any Test cases for testers to test and to provide feed back from. AFAIK there was never request [1] to QA to assist and set aside a test day to test Thusnelda ( or a mail sent to this list asking testers to test ) not even a reply to [2] and goes without saying if maintainers don't coordinate with QA or ask testers to test their feature ( which can be as simple as sending a mail to this list ) it wont get tested and thus it can be utterly broken which obviously means that marking feature 100% feature done is by all meaningless unless there are some QA/testing done to confirm it... [1]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa [2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/Thusnelda
begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:johannbg@xxxxx title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
