On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote: > I'm not about to advertise in the public space "Hey come over here > and download the RC which became the release, get it early and > destroy our bandwidth!" that's a valid point, but it makes me wonder -- how *did* i stumble across that iso? it's here: http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/12-Beta-RC2/Fedora-12-Beta-x86_64-DVD/ but i have no idea how i came to know about it. i'd never even *heard* of that "alt" subdomain. so how did i come across it? strange. and, just my personal opinion, if something is "officially" tagged as an RC2 (as it clearly is based on the name of the URL), i think it should have RC2 embedded in the iso name somewhere. it's not a massive effort, and it would prevent inevitable confusion down the road. witness this thread as an example. :-) further than that, deponent sayeth not. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
