On Fri, 16 Oct 2009, Eric Springer wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 'beta RC2' is the second release candidate _of the beta_. in other
> > words, the beta isn't done yet. pre-pre-releases like this are not
> > 'official' pre-releases, so we don't put them up on that page.
>
> Makes sense, although I can't help feel having something like alpha
> -> alpha2 ->alpha3 -> beta would be a better naming conversion, even
> if "alpha" and "beta" were the only two "official" ones.
ok, that clears things up in the sense that i couldn't figure out
*where* i got that tarball Fedora-12-Beta-x86_64-DVD.iso. if
pre-pre-releases like that are still going to be available (even if
not officially), it might be a good idea to add the RC# part to the
tarball name itself, just to avoid confusion.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
