On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:00 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > a valid philosophy but the linux kernel sees it differently, so it's > not like there's just one true way, but how fedora chooses to do this > is perfectly valid, thanks. If we were dealing with just a distribution of source, it could be different. But since we have to compile that source, and then compile those compiles into a binary install tree, there are lots of chances for things to go wrong, and so we test what will go out the door, rather than what we hope will be the same in the future if we do another compose. I've always taken offense to the term "release candidate" when there is no possible way the candidate could ever be released as is. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
