On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:56:00PM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > If somebody > would bring that mythical "simple, small, lightweight, local > delivery" MTA, and "you know where to look for full fledged servers > if you need them", then I would not mind this as an installation > default. Only that such thing is so far appears to be missing > (or esmtp can play here? I do not know). I was looking at that too last night. I don't *think* so, but the documentation wasn't all that clear, at least late at night. I think that had the guy who was going to evolve ssmtp into bsmtp, or perhaps bssmtp?, kept up with it, we would have had it. Maybe it is not that hard > to expand on an existing stuff but MTAs are famously devious beasts > with serious security implications. Yuppers. As the old joke goes in IRC. personX: (angry at something) God !!! %#(#@)(%*#@$@#(!@ personY: Please don't post your sendmail configuration in channel. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: I can't put it off any longer. I have to meet my terrible fate. Giles: What? Buffy: Biology. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
