Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jonathan Kamens (jik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
No, I think it's because permissions aren't being set properly on the
devices in /dev/snd:
jik2:~!1009$ ls -l /dev/snd
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 2009-07-02 17:22 by-path
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 9 2009-07-02 17:22 controlC0
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 4 2009-07-02 17:22 controlC2
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 8 2009-07-02 17:22 pcmC0D0c
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 7 2009-07-02 17:22 pcmC0D0p
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 6 2009-07-02 17:22 pcmC0D1c
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 5 2009-07-02 17:22 pcmC0D1p
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 3 2009-07-02 17:22 pcmC2D0c
crw-rw---- 1 root audio 116, 2 2009-07-02 17:22 timer
udev bug?
Permissions should be handled via ACL, which ls won't show.
Ah, yes, but shouldn't "ls -l" show a "+" as the last character of
the permissions if ACLs are in use? Jonathan's list doesn't show
them, so it ma be that the ACLs aren't set.
Johnathan, what does "getfacl /dev/snd/*" show? Is the user the
desktop is running as shown in a "user::" line?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer ricks@xxxxxxxx -
- AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 -
- -
- When all else fails, try reading the instructions. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
