On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 21:16, Reid Rivenburgh <reidr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > <snip> > >> Is it possible that some of my pre-upgrade rpms (when I was using >> F10's updates-testing, not rawhide) were newer versions than the F11 >> ones, and therefore they didn't get upgraded? That's what these >> versions seem to suggest. I guess I can force install the F11 >> versions now and get things in order? > > There's an updates-testing-repository for Fedora 11 as well. You can > find the same version of qt-mysql in that repository. > > See e.g. http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/updates/testing/11/x86_64/ > > If you have upgraded F10 with updates-testing enabled, you should > probably enable updates-testing on your F11 installation as well. I > guess it could be considered a preupgrade/anaconda bug that it isn't > done so by default? > > (Non-critical updates now end up in the "updates" repository for > Fedora 11, rather than getting pushed to rawhide - and before that > updates-testing) I see. I also just realized that I don't have rawhide enabled. For some reason, I thought it would be, and that having rawhide enabled was a good thing until the post-release update that moves me from rawhide back to non-rawhide F11 (if I understand that process correctly). In any case, enabling rawhide didn't give me any new packages, as you suggest. I assumed rawhide was always at least as new (in terms of version number) as update-testing, and similarly for updates-testing for updates. I guess that's not necessarily true around release time. I enabled updates-testing, and I do have lots of updates available now. So I guess I do want both updates-testing and rawhide enabled? Thanks for all of the help. I hope this hasn't been hashed out lots of times already. I just re-joined the testing list when I upgraded. Reid -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
