On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:21:58AM -0600, Reid Rivenburgh wrote: >> >> Another potential problem I have is this: >> >> % rpm -qa | grep fc10 | wc -l >> 136 > > If you install 'yum-utils' then you will find there > 'package-cleanup' utility. The first check is > > package-cleanup --problems > > If none are reported then your installation is self-consistent. > The next one would be > > package-cleanup --orphans > > If you will see some "orphans", i.e. packages not in F11 > repositories, then you may remove some or all of them. Check for > "problems" again once you did that. > > Assorted packages in F11 repos can be inherited from F10. Quite > often there is no need to recompile. Thanks for the reminder about package-cleanup. Unfortunately, I do have problems. Some I was able to easily resolve, but here's one tricky one (of about 10 total): Package qt-mysql-4.5.1-10.fc10.x86_64 requires libcrypto.so.7()(64bit) I just checked a development mirror site and found this: qt-mysql-4.5.0-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm Is it possible that some of my pre-upgrade rpms (when I was using F10's updates-testing, not rawhide) were newer versions than the F11 ones, and therefore they didn't get upgraded? That's what these versions seem to suggest. I guess I can force install the F11 versions now and get things in order? Thanks, Reid -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
