Allen Kistler wrote:
was: Shouldn't the fact that beagle doesn't work with firefox
be a release blocker?
Brian Pepple wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:13 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477639
No, I don't believe that meets the release blocker criteria.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/ReleaseCriteria
So in a slightly different direction...
All the release criteria on the referenced page are about booting and
running, which makes sense as far as it goes, but what about shutting
down? Although they're mostly fixed now, there was a series of bugs
dealing with F11 being unable under certain conditions to shut down
without the use of the power button.
It's a generic enough condition, I think it should probably apply to any
release of any OS, maybe here with wording something like "installed
system MUST be able to shut down or reboot from any runlevel" and
perhaps with an additional "installed system SHOULD be able to change
between any two runlevels."
For most wikis, I'd have put the question on the Talk page, but
ReleaseCriteria doesn't have a Talk page.
Anyway, thoughts?
I generally understand the difference between "should" and "must," but
in these criteria I don't so how "should" us useful. How many shoulds
does it take to make a must?
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
