On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 11:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, guys. Here's a revised draft of my proposed mail on the priority / > severity issue to -devel-list. It addresses the points that have come up > since the original draft (I think, I hope I didn't miss any) and adds > Matej's alternative to the original proposal. > > Does this look OK? OK, so, follow-up on this: Matej sent the draft to the devel list, where it died a quiet death. :) Which is actually fine by me, since all we needed to hear from devs is that it's not going to *hurt* them. And no-one complained. So I reckon we should just go ahead and start setting priority / severity, then see where we are in a few weeks, or at the end of F12 cycle. But we need to pick either the Williamson / Beland Method (triagers set both priority / severity), or the Cepl Method (triagers set severity only). I don't really mind, I can go with either system. Does anyone have a strong opinion either way? Votes? Thanks, guys! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
