On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Can, or will, the voting system come into play? Then reporters, and bz > > account holders (e.g. Fedora/Red Hat *users*) don't lose all of the > > emotional "points" gained by submitting the report in the first place. > > We want reporters (users) to make use of bugzilla.redhat.com, and not > > have them think of it as a black-hole of their personal time, where > > these fields are only controlled by others. As sort of a way of > > giving something back emotionally, yet also providing feedback that > > could sway the severity one notch higher, if the bug warrants it. > > Interesting question...I think it could definitely be something to be > considered by triagers in setting the values, yeah. If a lot of people > vote for a bug that's usually a reasonably reliable indicator that it > affects enough people seriously enough for them to care. To clarify here: I'm definitely not in favour of any automatic (in terms of having it done by a script, or a compulsory relationship defined in Bugzappers procedure) relationship between number of votes and priority or severity. That's not at all a good idea. Just it's something triagers could choose to take into account when setting those values, if they like. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
