On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:47 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > James Laska said the following on 04/17/2009 10:22 AM Pacific Time: > > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:56 -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > >> What is the plan for these pages? > >> > >> It may look a little funny to be pointing to some of these pages at GA > >> if they are "still needing QA approval". > >> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Features_needing_QA_approval > > > > This started as a way to manage QA review of Fedora features. However, > > I don't believe we've made a lot of progress during this release. > > > > I'm inclined to batch move these to approved at this point. Perhaps > > something to revisit for F12 (or beyond) ... feature triage. > > > > Any objections/concerns? > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > Or just drop the category if the process changed or wasn't used? Thanks, I've gone ahead with that approach. Hopefully we can revisit QA engagement in the feature process at a later date. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
