On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 14:29 +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > Rob has a fair point. I'd think most of the logic to avoid this problem > exists in various packages such as yum, that do dependency tracking and > checking. > > Checking that rawhide (and other repos) is consistent before pushing an > update is sensible, and maybe not too difficult if maybe not of the > greatest urgency. OK, so we check. Then what happens if it's not? That's a harder question to answer. And usually the issues are transient ones like this that you can easily just dodge with --skip-broken, so where's the real harm? The broken deps get reported daily so it's not like they're hidden. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
