Re: what *is* the proper recipe for 64-bit flash support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Scott Robbins wrote:

> I have a little page on this--note I suggest editing
> /etc/sysconfig/nsplugwrapper, but have heard that this might cause
> issues with selinux, so you might want to skip that part.
>
> http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/flash64.html

  ah, excellent.  a couple more dumb questions, if i might.  at the
moment, i've configured things to use the "old-style" way of getting
64-bit flash, where /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so is a
symlink to /usr/lib/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so, and that latter
file is part of the flash-plugin.i386 package.

  i'm guessing that i can just "yum remove flash-plugin", which i
believe removes the symlink, and simply dump that new .so file into
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins.  it's self-contained so that should be all i
need, right?

  do i still need the nspluginwrapper packages if i go this route?

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux