--- On Thu, 4/2/09, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: what *is* the proper recipe for 64-bit flash support? > To: olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx, "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2009, 9:09 AM > ok, here's what i've found so far. given a couple > different online > sources for info: > > > http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f10.html#flash > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash#For_x86_64 > > the *old* recipe for 64-bit flash (not using adobe's > alpha 64-bit > plugin) was to first install the adobe release rpm to get > the adobe > yum repository info, and then: > > # yum install \ > flash-plugin \ > nspluginwrapper.{i386,x86_64} \ > alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i386 \ > libcurl.i386 > > while this might have worked under f10, it won't work > under f11 since > the "i386" suffixes appear to have been replaced > with "i586". other > than that, the packages seem to exist, so i guess i can > just give it a > shot. does that look right? > > rday > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day > Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry: > Have classroom, will lecture. > > http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, > Ontario, CANADA > ======================================================================== That was the way it was installed before. But now there's an x86_64 beta and it would be better(I guess for Adobe) that we test the x86_64 beta flash plugin and report back to them. The way in the examples makes use of the i386 counterparts and is (not helping) them? Regards, Antonio -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
