TK009 wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
I should add that I'm talking in terms of practicality here, and taking
into consideration that we have not many active triagers trying to
triage a very large amount of bugs. In that situation, it's sometimes
better to triage 100 bugs without reproduction at an accuracy rate of
85% than it is to triage 15 bugs with reproduction at an accuracy rate
of 95%. IMHO, anyway.
That is it in a nutshell. Less than 20 active triagers (according to the
list http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/ActiveTriagers), 6000+
bugs in NEW state. I never discourage others from reproducing, if they
can, it's a bonus. Requiring that a triager try and reproduce every bug,
is asking to much of mostly (all?) volunteers.
TK009
I'm only guessing at what RH _might_ do, basing those guesses on what I
know. One fact for example, is that RH draws from Fedora to create its
RHEL releases, so there appears to be some self-interest in ensuring
software likely to be in RHEL works on computers RHEL is likely to be
run on.
What RH _should_ do has to be tempered by its cost, and I have no means
of guessing there.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
