Hello Bruno, Sunday, March 8, 2009, 12:12:07 PM, you wrote: > Sorry about not reading your message carefully. > Still the other bug with your hardware mentioned might be worth looking > at as well as the Intel KMS feature. The person working on the feature > may be able to tell you if your hardware is targetted to work as part of it. The Intel drivers are very fragile, and defaulting acceleration to "on" F9/10 while simultaneously removing the X-Org configuration file and the system-config-display utility have made addressing the problem much worse. The last release that worked for me was F8 (now EOL). I skipped F9 (broken for X). I was able to install from the final F10 release (the F10 preview release also was broken for X). Things went south a week after install, when the Intel hardware / dbus and pam updates came out. Many bugs have been filed, by myself and others. Most go unanswered, and the focus seems to be on bypassing rather than fixing issues. All F10 code updates so far have not addressed these problems. Many generations of Intel graphics hardware (both old and new) are affected. A check of Bugzilla, both Fedora and Xorg since the fall shows it's not a pretty picture for any Linux distributions with current X on Intel. It seems strange (and sad) that so soon into the life of a release major regressions can happen... followed by a deafening science. There seems to be very little urgency (or developer time/focus) on fixing this in F10. Rawhide may be important... but only if existing releases can actually be used in real life. Al -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
