On 17.02.2009 08:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
If you actually look at the list, few of them fit the description 'big
data package'. They're normal things like applications, libraries and X
drivers, which really should get rebuilt from cycle to cycle.
There was no mass rebuild for Fedora 10, so packages were only rebuilt for
F10 if they actually changed, or needed a rebuild for a new version of a
dependency.
Which IMHO is a good thing.
As for the packages which weren't rebuilt even for F9, they might have
failed the rebuild for GCC 4.3.
Shouldn't the "Fails To Build From Source" effort (
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS ) have catched (and removed) those
in between?
CU
knurd
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
