On 15.02.2009 19:34, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 03:45 -0500, Christopher Beland wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 22:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
<snip>
In my system, which was a clean install of F10 followed by a Rawhide
upgrade (I also have rpmfusion enabled, but I think few if any of these
are from fusion):
[adamw@adam ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fc9
mingetty-1.08-2.fc9.x86_64
[...]
[adamw@adam ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fc8
paktype-fonts-2.0-2.fc8.noarch
fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch
ql2100-firmware-1.19.38-1.fc8.1.noarch
ql2200-firmware-2.02.08-1.fc8.1.noarch
[adamw@adam ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fc7
htmlview-4.0.0-3.fc7.noarch
At a guess, these failed the rebuilds, perhaps?
Most are likely just packages that haven't been rebuild during the past
few devel cycles and hence still have the disstag from the F7, F8, F9,
or F10 devel cycle. That's normal, as there is no need to rebuild big
data packages without need, as that would force unnecessary downloads
for people.
To find orphans use "yum list extras" or "package-cleanup --orphans"
from yum-utils.
CU
knurd
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
