On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 12:40 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:34:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > [adamw@adam ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fc8 > > paktype-fonts-2.0-2.fc8.noarch > > fedorainfinity-screensaver-theme-1.0.0-1.fc8.noarch > > ql2100-firmware-1.19.38-1.fc8.1.noarch > > ql2200-firmware-2.02.08-1.fc8.1.noarch > > > > [adamw@adam ~]$ rpm -qa | grep fc7 > > htmlview-4.0.0-3.fc7.noarch > > > > At a guess, these failed the rebuilds, perhaps? > > Not necessarily; especially if these are 'noarch' packages which > were just "carried over" to subsequent distros. They also could be > "orphans" and 'package-cleanup --orphans' may have something to say > on the subject. If something is not orphan then it is current > regardless of its tag. As I said, the system never had f7, 8 or 9 installed. So even if they're 'orphans', they're orphans which were sourced from f10. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
