On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Jerry Amundson <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Firefox performance >> From: Adam Pribyl <pribyl@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> Date: 02/13/2009 10:45 AM >> >>> Is there anything we can do to improve the Fedora picture? >>> >>> http://www.tuxradar.com/content/browser-benchmarks-2-even-wine-beats-linux-firefox >> >> >> Yes, this needs to be addressed. >> >> i386 Firefox 3.0.6 i386 Firefox 3.0.6 w/ Wine >> Score: 99.9 Score: 117 >> Richards: 97.5 Richards: 139 >> DeltaBlue: 122 DeltaBlue: 154 >> Crypto: 83.0 Crypto: 83.4 >> RayTrace: 84.3 RayTrace: 88.6 >> EarleyBoyer: 140 EarleyBoyer: 157 >> RegExp: 85.7 RegExp: 101 >> >> Pentium 4 3.06ghz >> 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.i686 >> >> This is after running the test three times on each browser. Let me add that >> using -safe-mode made Zero difference in this test. With a capital Z. >> >> Turning off compiz gave me a whole 5 extra total score points. > > Hmm, you running Gnome? On my laptop (Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor > 2.00GHz), fresh F10, and updated (KDE 4.2, woo-hoo! :-), I get 120. > Score: 120 > Richards: 144 > DeltaBlue: 158 > Crypto: 79.8 > RayTrace: 114 > EarleyBoyer: 134 > RegExp: 110 > > 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.i686 > firefox-3.0.6-1.fc10.i386 > kdebase-4.2.0-2.fc10.i386 Is compiz the same as "Enable desktop effects" in KDE? Either way, it drops the same machine to 104. Score: 104 Richards: 53.2 DeltaBlue: 158 Crypto: 77.7 RayTrace: 111 EarleyBoyer: 161 RegExp: 108 jerry -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
