Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > > Creating the image is rather easy; checking that it doesn't break badly or > has any other undesired side effects, repeating the above for all > supported > architectures, shipping them out to mirrors (and getting mirrors to agree > on carrying more large files) is where the real work is. Plus the risk of > Accepted - but I was doing a private re-spin for my own use. > giving Fedora a bad name with a busted respin. Just check how long it > takes > to move from the first images to the images finally shipped on release. > Sure, for a respin the work would be somewhat less (much less brand-new > contents), but still. > Of course - but as I said it was/is a private respin - if someone does this and it breaks their system then Fedora is not responsible. However I do know of some people who installed the release iso for F10 on a machine with real scsi disks and this left them with an unbootable system until an install from the DVD physical media was done in a different way. Doing a private iso with updated mkinitrd/kernel/nash that were issued as updates since release might have helped in that case. > Besides, there is Fedora Unity... why do a job others have already > volunteered to do? > At the present time I have not seen a re-spin available from Fedora Unity for the DVD install iso? SO making a private one is for me under this scenario the only option! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Where-has-the-F10-DVD-iso-file-gone--tp21194664p21259688.html Sent from the Fedora Test List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
