There's no need to be nasty, I very new at this and had no idea what's involve (as I mentioned before) in the making of an ISO. One day if I keep at it I will be as good as you profess to be. On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 20:34 -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Lawrence E. Graves <lgraves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > John, strange you should say that. A few days ago, I asked a friend of > > mine that same question. I personally think that whenever there are > > updates to Fedora 10 after you have installed it, there should > > automatically be an undated ISO. When the need arises, there will > > always be a fresh version of Fedora 10. I don't know what's all > > involved in the making of an iso, but it sound feasible. > > That certainly isn't feasible. There are updates almost every day, > especially for the first couple of months after release. Ignoring the > actual work involved in spinning a release, even if you just respin the > DVD ISO and not the CDs or LiveCDs, and only for the binaries and not > the sources, that would be almost 12G of daily churn (plus the actual > updates) on the mirrors. Torrents wouldn't help with only a 24 hour > "shelf life". > > It also makes debugging somebody's install problems virtually > impossible, since you have no idea what release-of-the-day they are > using. > > -- > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> > Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services > I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. > -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
