Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 02 January 2009 11:30:21 am Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Right, KDE bugs should usually be reported to bugs.kde.org. They should get > > fixed upstream. Still, filing at bugzilla.redhat.com too can't hurt, worst > > case we'll just close it as UPSTREAM, but in some cases we'll backport > > fixes or even try to fix it ourselves if the problem is important enough > > and easy enough to fix. > What if someone opened the bug in Fedora's bz because they wanted to know > when the fix actually landed in Fedora? I was about to write a new topic > on Fedora devel asking if we should do away with closing bugs UPSTREAM > because it does not allow one to find out when something was finally > fixed in Fedora vs upstream. This happened to me 2 weeks ago. I now have > a bug closed and no way of knowing if and when its actually fixed in a > stable release. There is no guarantee that each and every bug filed will be closed by the packager. I've had to close more than one bug I opened as it got fixed in the course of updating. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
