The particular bug I came upon is upstream[1], but could certainly apply within Fedora. I see a few directions that can be taken. 1. The hard line approach - CLOSE it and cite the bug writing Principles page[2], specifically, "One bug per report". (noticeably *absent* from bugs.kde.org) 2. Something nicer and, therefore, takes longer... Thank you for taking the time, blah, blah. In it's current form, this report is unusable, so... (Item 1) is a dup of (link) (Item 2) has been opened as (link to new bz #) ,,, (Item N) such and such. 3. One or another variation of 2. Thoughts? jerry [1] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171832 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=bug-writing.html -- To be named later. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
