On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Jesse Keating wrote:
*shrug* it's about target audience. Can you honestly tell me that the
pre-network manager world was better for dealing with wireless networks,
roaming from one location to another, typical laptop usage?
No, the pre-network manager world was not better for those systems. So for
those systems it is perhaps an advance. But that doesn't justify breaking
it for the other 90+% (or, in my case, 100%). I don't use Fedora for most
of my boxes (they are CentOS): what scares me is that this is going to
show up in Redhat/CentOS one of these days, and then I'm in a whole world
of hurt. If I'm starting the first hard-wired DHCP interface after boot on
a system that hasn't declared a hostname, NM *has* to be able to set the
hostname.
Steve
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
