On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Steve Grubb wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 19:30:15 John Poelstra wrote: >>> >>> I'm trying to meet a (probably overly aggressive) personal goal of >>> having zero NEW rawhide bugs (which are not Package Reviews) by the time >>> of Fedora 10 GA. >> >> Please leave my packages alone. I leave them in NEW until I've had a >> chance to review them. If you change it, I may think I've already taken some >> action action. >> > > I guess triagers hear this a lot... I know I've been talking to several > people about this, but has a serious request for a CONFIRMED status or flag > ever been put in with the bugzilla maintainers? I'm not sure whether that > can be done for the Fedora Product alone, as obviously (if it can only be > done for the entire bugzilla, globally) this would impact RH's workflows. Quoting https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow#ON_QA does "The VERIFIED bug state is not used by Fedora." indicate VERIFIED is also not used by RH? If it is not used, could VERIFIED == CONFIRMED? Also, my apologies for the ranting of my evil twin. [take your meds. take your meds...] On on positive note, communication on the topic continues in spite of my, ahem, unorthodox methods. Lastly, Happy Birthday Fedora!! :-) :-) jerry -- There's plenty of youth in America - it's time we find the "fountain of smart". -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
