Although I'm proud of using fedora as
it is Bleeding Edge of software, but I think the unstable part of
project should be tested by fedora-testers, not end users, they(end
users) must always feel stable, don't you think so?
As far as
fedora use pre-release versions of softwares, it means that fedora
developers are so courage that they use the Bleeding Edge of
software, it's so good and appreciated. But I think what reaches the
end users, must be the last stable versions of softwares, not
unstable pre-release ones. As a result, I can not see any movie in my
fedora 9 release yet. Do you think it's normal? As another
illustration I think fedora must let users chose their X server. I
have an ATI Mobility Radeon and as the driver is not prepared
completely yet, I can not use the 3D acceleration capabilities of my
graphic card.
why is it unstable? it was shipped with Pre-Release of Xorg7.4 an 1.5 so its not like the Fedora users werent warned. plus when you use fedora your using Bleeding Edge software, you have to expect some things to be unstable at first, its like a Brand New car, when you buy one, even that has its problems until you get it fixed
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
