Re: Fedora 9 updates-testing report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrin Jalali wrote:
I think this release is one of the most unstable releases ever in redhat/fedora history.

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:30 AM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 22:29 +0000, updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >     yum-3.2.16-1.fc9

    So, let's just suffice to say: Don't use this release. I'll build a -2
    in a bit.

    -sv


    --
    fedora-test-list mailing list
    fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
    To unsubscribe:
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list


why is it unstable? it was shipped with Pre-Release of Xorg7.4 an 1.5 so its not like the Fedora users werent warned. plus when you use fedora your using Bleeding Edge software, you have to expect some things to be unstable at first, its like a Brand New car, when you buy one, even that has its problems until you get it fixed

--
Regards Greg

begin:vcard
fn:Gregory Evenden
n:Evenden;Gregory
email;internet:spowd@xxxxxxxxxxx
tel;cell:0437 003 032
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux