On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 4:51 PM, John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 17:57 +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > > > > > I have, but it's not the trademark issues that reflect what I have. If I > built it differently, perhaps with different compiler options, perhaps > inadvertently differently, it's not the same. > > > > > > > Composing Fedora releases doesn't involve any compiling. The only > > > > I didn't say or imply composing. I said "building" and my example involved > a good deal of compiling. Why would you compile anything? The DVD installation set is nothing more than a pungi compose using a certain kickstart file. No magic there. > > The earlier suggestion was composing from Rawhide, and there seems to be a > certain randomness there, with results not being reproducible. They are reproducible for that day. All that Alpha, Beta, and PR really are is composes from rawhide on a given day. Same with the "non-public" RC releases - the exact reason that they're not public is they'd be obsolete the next day. I tend to make DVD sets fairly often (just ask Jesse and the number of pungi/anaconda/yum bugs I hit :) ). -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
