On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:15 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Chuck Anderson (cra@xxxxxxx) said: > > > I think that there are probably a lot more flash apps out there that > > > swfdec *does* work with - just no one has taken the time to report > > > them. > > > > What's with considering proprietary codecs as failures (red)? Most > > flash out there is going to need proprietary or patent-encumbered > > codecs. > > Out of the box it fails; I don't see how that can be considered > a successful test. Note that all of the ones I marked with red > fail even *with* the codecs - they terminate early, abort, crash, > etc. If it was just the codecs, I would have left it as yellow. This scratch build of swfdec should fix bug #441617, which caused the majority of the failures that Bill saw. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=561193 Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
