On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 11:08 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:34:55AM -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Adam Pribyl <pribyl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, James Laska wrote: > > > > > > > A rawhide test result summary is available at: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestResults/Fedora9Swfdec/Rawhide > > > > > > This does not look very promissing... > > > > I think that there are probably a lot more flash apps out there that > > swfdec *does* work with - just no one has taken the time to report > > them. > > What's with considering proprietary codecs as failures (red)? Most > flash out there is going to need proprietary or patent-encumbered > codecs. I still think there is enormous value in shipping swfdec in > Fedora, even if they require proprietary codecs to work on e.g. > Youtube. I've had success with Youtube, with the problem that video > playback terminates about 3/4 or 7/8 of the way through them. > > I say ship it, which is the only way it will get wide enough use and > testing which will hopefully result in these types of bugs being > fixed. > I think we've fix bug #441617, which was causing most of the failures that Bill was seeing. I want to do a little more quick testing, and if I see no major problems, I'll post a link to a scratch build of swfdec with the fix for you guys. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
