On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 08:03 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 22:32 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote: > > Andrew Farris wrote: > > > Rawhide wrote: > > > > > > A package update list that is totally out of order but should have been > > > alphabetical (that was probably obvious). > > > > Since that was the second report out today was that manually generated? Just > > occurred to me that would explain the ordering. > > Actually it was a different tool, repodiff vs treediff. One uses yum > repodata to compare, the other opens every file. Guess which one is > faster? (: > > repodiff probably just needs a tweak to sort things in alphabetical > order rather than repo order. If you want to throw a patch at the > yum-utils upstream that would be hot. just checked this into repodiff upstream I also just checked in -q getting rid of debug output from yum, too. -sv -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
