On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 22:32 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote: > Andrew Farris wrote: > > Rawhide wrote: > > > > A package update list that is totally out of order but should have been > > alphabetical (that was probably obvious). > > Since that was the second report out today was that manually generated? Just > occurred to me that would explain the ordering. Actually it was a different tool, repodiff vs treediff. One uses yum repodata to compare, the other opens every file. Guess which one is faster? (: repodiff probably just needs a tweak to sort things in alphabetical order rather than repo order. If you want to throw a patch at the yum-utils upstream that would be hot. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
