Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Whether it should or not, the failure I had with it illustrates my
point very nicely.
Sure. That is why I said "should". Bugs happen.
There's not much evidence. System booted without "quiet rhgb." No
trace that I can see of the failed boot (no /var/log/dmesg from it).
This is the kernel: 2.6.24.1-28.fc9
If someone gave me a bug report like that, it wouldn't be high on my
priorities.
It is useful filing it anyway. If others can reproduce the problem, then
we can confirm your observation.
I'll see about it when my existing report against 2.6.25 is fixed. Until
then I'm running an obsolete kernel and it's really not worth bothering
with if it's gone away, magically or otherwise.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
