X.org server 1.5: An ABI Too Far?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Should Rawhide switch back to a supported version of X.org,
or at least make it an option?  Much of what makes a desktop
contemporary depends on features in the Nvidia driver not
presented in the nv driver.

I Googled around and didn't find any explanation of what
fantastic wonders await us with the new ABI.  I did get the
impression the new X.org ABI isn't even settled yet, let alone
finished and implemented.
If that is true,  perhaps Fedora should stick with a working
version of X until the support for the New X is there.  Or at
least provide a working (e.g., Compiz et al.) X as a choice.

--
Chuck Forsberg    caf@xxxxxxxx   www.omen.com   503-614-0430
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
 Omen Technology Inc      "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   FAX 629-0665

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux