Re: Is It Worth Installing F9 Alpha? (upstart)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:38:06AM +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 03:12:07PM +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
upstart eh? I met that on ubuntu, I'm glad to see it. It probably explains another bug: this doesn't work:
[summer@localhost ~]$ egrep mingetty.*clear /etc/inittab
1:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty --noclear tty1
[summer@localhost ~]$
If I understand things correctly, which here should not be assumed,
this is not a bug but a feature.

OTOH it seems to me that this detail that scripts in /etc/event.d/
are not marked "config" is a BUG.

I think it's bug that /etc/inittab didn't get translated in the upgrade from f8 to f9a.

Here we come again to a "config" problem.  /etc/inittab is marked as
a configuration file.  Even if that would get translated that would
not help you at all as on the next update all these translations
would be silently clobbered.  Those files likely should be even
"config noreplace".

I don't see a problem with translating /etc/inittab when upstart is first installed. Not doing so leads to a problem, translating my modifications seems sensible. I could maybe forgive its missing the change for mingetty on tty though I think it should be doable, but the additions seem pretty straightforward. Having done the translation, hide inittab with the usual rename.

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux