Re: Bugzilla 'version' changes for Fedora this Friday!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Chambers said the following on 11/28/2007 09:08 PM Pacific Time:
Moving everything and the renaming is fine as is, to get things up to
date.  Not that I don't want to see things changed, just issues I
thought of.  But how will it work during testing?  As in, you have FX
Beta and you file bugs against rawhide?  And during testing, alpha,
beta, testing, rc, whatever they all go against rawhide, and the bugs
stay against rawhide between testing releases?  That may work fine, but
what about once the testing goes gold?  Do all bugs between last
official release that were filed against rawhide, get moved to the
final?

I think they should get moved.

FX Development begins..

--->Alpha - bugs filed against rawhide?
---->Test - bugs filed against rawhide?
----->Beta- bugs filed against rawhide?
------>RC - bugs filed against rawhide?
------->Gold - Bugs moved from rawhide to FX?

In other words, no bugs should exist against rawhide, except during
development cycle between official releases?


I completely agree.  By performing the step you are suggesting at GOLD we establish somewhat of a marker in BZ as to when the issue was filed (vs. rawhide forever)... w/o having to pull up the bug and look at it.

We discussed this a little here too: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2007-November/msg00867.html

John

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux