Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, John Summerfield wrote:
maybe for the future, the description for this list could include
something like this text:
If you want to track and discuss testing package updates, then you
might join fedora-test-updates too.
yes, that sounds about right. my objection was based on this list's
own description in the "To:" line above, and i emphasize:
"For testers of Fedora Core development ***releases***"
not "packages". "releases". so, not to put too fine a point on it,
unless you have something to discuss related to a fedora development
***release***, you should take that information elsewhere, and a new
ML would seem to be the perfect solution.
rday
I joined for the same reason as rday. I want to be here to talk about
how the next _release_ is broken, and maybe opine as to what its content
should be.
I'm not a hacker, and I'm not sure I want to flog myself with raw hide.
As I recall from the Westerns I used to read, it hurts.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
Please do not reply off-list
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
