Re: portaudio-19-3.fc8 or portaudio-devel-19-3.fc8 bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:05:35 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> > libportaudio.so belongs to portaudio-devel
> > libportaudio.so.2 and libportaudio.so.2.0.0 belong to portaudio
> 
> It is like that in Fedora 8 Development, because the newer
> libportaudio has a soname.
> 
> > "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so" returns nothing.
> > "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so.2" returns portaudio.
> > "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so.2.0.0" returns nothing.

And to add a comment, since I just noticed that in the subject
you refer to F8 packages while in the message your refer to F7:

Only "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so.2" is a _valid_ query,
since "libportaudio.so.2" is the library's soname, whereas the other
two are not. They are just files or symlinks, which are provided via
the filelist, so you would need to change the queries to

  rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libportaudio.so
  rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2
  rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2.0.0

if you want to cover the files,
and only for the soname:

  rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so.2

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux