Re: portaudio-19-3.fc8 or portaudio-devel-19-3.fc8 bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:49:39 -0600, Jerry Williams wrote:

> I am trying to install crrcsim and it wants libportaudio.so
> Under Fedora 7 "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so" returns
> portaudio
> 
> When I look in /usr/lib I see:
> libportaudio.so -> libportaudio.so.2.0.0
> libportaudio.so.2 -> libportaudio.so.2.0.0
> libportaudio.so.2.0.0

What do you get for "rpm -q portaudio"?
The Fedora 7 version of portaudio has no soname. It only
ships libportaudio.so in a single portaudio pkg and a 
virtual portaudio-devel pkg.
 
> libportaudio.so belongs to portaudio-devel
> libportaudio.so.2 and libportaudio.so.2.0.0 belong to portaudio

It is like that in Fedora 8 Development, because the newer
libportaudio has a soname.

> "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so" returns nothing.
> "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so.2" returns portaudio.
> "rpm -q --whatprovides libportaudio.so.2.0.0" returns nothing.

Looks like it is not the Fedora pkg.

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux