Re: all I wanted was to update the kernel, not a crypto lesson ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 15:07:27 +0100
"Christopher Brown" <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Can someone then explain to me why the rawhide key does not already
> exist on an installed system? Should this not be set up as with base,
> updates and others to prevent issues like Nelson's?

The two keys used right now are 

pub   1024D/4F2A6FD2 2003-10-27
uid                  Fedora Project <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx>

Used for final releases and updates.

pub   1024D/30C9ECF8 2003-10-27
uid                  Fedora Project (Test Software) <rawhide@xxxxxxxxxx>

Used for Test releases and updates-testing.

Both of which are installed on the system, however not imported into
the rpmdb.

These keys may change in the future as we transition to a signing
server to sign packages (and to close up some confusion between Test
and rawhide stuff).

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux