Re: bugzilla category for "nash"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 14:03 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 09:54 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> > Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 04:53:56 -0400 (EDT), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > >   i was just going to submit a minor cleanup request for "nash",
> > > > > but it doesn't appear to have a component entry in bugzilla under
> > > > > f8t1.
> > 
> > > > The Component entry is derived from the src.rpm name => mkinitrd for
> > > > nash.
> > 
> > > ah, thank you, which of course brings up the inevitable dumb question:
> > > how would one have known that without first having, uh, known that?
> > 
> > $ rpm -qf $(which nash)  #;-)
> 
> % rpm -qf `which nash`
> nash-6.0.9-9
> 
> -q only gives you the binary rpm, not the src rpm.

rpm -q --qf '%{sourcerpm}' -f $(which nash)

Ralf


-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux