On 07/06/2007 09:16 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > > > I'm assuming you're after the tickless work? Still unsure whether to > > > enable that by default as an FC6 update. Perhaps we'll try it for > > > the first test update, see what the fallout is like, and if it looks > > > scary, compile it in, but off-by-default. > > > > Ok that is good to know. Just as long as how to enable the tickless > > option is documented. > > > > So what would be the expected fallout from that option being enabled? > > Are there things that you know that would definitely break? > > Timers are pretty fundamental to a working kernel, so it could manifest > itself in numerous ways. Right down to 'doesnt boot'. Enabling tickless will definitely break someone's machine. Somewhere. If people want that feature they should upgrade to Fedora 7. :-) -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
